Alyssa Vera, Runas y Magia Nórdica (2022) — an honest review
The verdict, briefly. Runas y Magia Nórdica (original in Spanish) is a popular beginner's guide to "Norse magic" and runes, self-published on Amazon KDP. It is not a source on antiquity but a 20th–21st-century practice manual in a Spanish-language wrapper — and "wrapper" is the operative word: the book is not Latin American syncretism but an import of Anglophone esoteric runework (Blum, Thorsson, Aswynn), retold without naming its lineage and without a single bibliographic reference. Its strength is an honest non-supernatural framing ("magic as a science of intention") and a serviceable retelling of the saga basis (seiðr, spá, galdr); its weakness is that it passes off revival constructs as ancient (the blank Wyrd rune, the "Nine Noble Virtues") and contains a crude factual error in dating the futhark. Read it if you're an outright beginner who wants a gentle entry into practice and reads Spanish. Skip it if you want to understand what the Norse actually did with runes — here there are no sources and no separation of layers.
Layering. Below we tag claims:
[historical]— confirmed by inscriptions/philology;[revival, 20th–21st c.]— constructed in modern times;[practice]— what the author prescribes doing;[unproven]— a claimed magical effect with no test of external causation. This isn't nit-picking; it's how we stay honest — and it's exactly what this book lacks.
What the book is
Under the name Alyssa Vera appears a Spanish-language beginner's guide (Amazon KDP, ASIN B09QH14KS7, published 13 January 2022). The genre is popular "magia nórdica" esoteric practice with no academic apparatus: not a single bibliographic reference, not one footnote. The closing lines ("leave a review on Amazon," "with love, Alyssa") give away commercial self-publishing — probably a serial beginner's product, possibly translated or ghostwritten. The author's name is most likely a publishing pseudonym.
Structurally there are four layers: (1) a brief retelling of Norse mythology and the cosmology of the Nine Worlds; (2) a survey of historical Norse magical arts — seiðr, spá, galdr, domestic magic, rune magic — where the book leans on the sagas and common runology and is broadly accurate; (3) modern Heathenry / Ásatrú; and (4) the practical part — rune magic, talismans, runescripts, bindrunes, making and consecrating your own runes, divination spreads, and rune meanings. It's that fourth layer that is the core of the book — and it is entirely revival.
What in the book is ancient, and what is a 20th–21st-century invention
The real value of an honest review is separating the layers, because the book itself does not. The key point: the historical chapters retell genuine saga material broadly correctly, but the practical system is modern Anglophone esoterica passed off as "Norse tradition." And what matters most for understanding the Spanish-language scene: this is not a local Latin American hybrid but an import — the whole text sits in a Germanic-Norse frame, the terms are kept as English calques (runescripts, bindrunes), and the lineage is never named.
| Element of the book | Layer | Who/when, in fact |
|---|---|---|
| Elder Futhark — 24 signs, three ættir of 8 | [historical] |
Common runology; the ætt-names ("Freya's / Hagall's / Tyr's eight") are a late esoteric convention |
| Dating the futhark to "around the 2nd c. BC" | [unproven] (error) |
Factual error: the early inscriptions and Elder Futhark are 2nd c. AD, not BC |
| Seiðr, spá, galdr, völva, ørlög, the Norns | [historical] |
Retelling of the sagas and Tacitus (Veleda) is broadly correct, but with no reference → unverifiable |
| The 25th, blank "Wyrd" rune | [revival, 20th–21st c.] |
The blank rune was introduced by Ralph Blum, The Book of Runes, 1982; it does not exist in historical futharks. Not ancient |
| The "Nine Noble Virtues" as the core of Ásatrú | [revival, 20th–21st c.] |
A 1970s construct (Odinic Rite / Asatru Free Assembly); the book wrongly presents them as "from historical sources" |
| Correspondence tables: colors, weekdays with deities, woods | [revival, 20th–21st c.] |
A standard 20th-c. esoteric table, not saga material |
| Runescript numerology (3=growth, 5=victory, 7=love, 9=Norns) | [revival, 20th–21st c.] · [practice] |
Modern number-symbolism, not ancient |
| Talismans, runescripts, bindrunes, making your own runes | [practice] |
Modern practice in the Thorsson/Aswynn line; "reddening" runes is in the sagas [historical], but the full ritual is reconstruction |
| Spreads (1/3/5/7 runes, past-present-future) | [revival, 20th–21st c.] · [practice] |
A runic spread as a method is modern; the ancient divination method is unknown |
| Claimed effects of the practices | [unproven] |
No controlled studies; the author honestly explains the mechanism psychologically |
One thing is especially telling: the undeclared debt to Ralph Blum. The 25-rune system with a blank Wyrd rune is his 1982 invention — a direct marker of the Blum lineage, not of the Elder Futhark. The book even softens it: "the concept was probably known to the ancients too" — precisely the move by which revival gets passed off as antiquity. More in the Uthark and the timeline of the rune revival.
Strengths
- An honest non-supernatural framing. The author states outright that rune magic is "not
something supernatural but a well-thought-out, self-determined scientific exercise," and that a
talisman's force "does not come from inside the object but is generated by the mage's mind." That's
a
[mechanism]model of intention/expectation, not a claim about literal physics — and it's more honest than many esoteric texts. - Sound historical chapters. The sections on seiðr, spá, galdr, the völva, ørlög and the Norns retell the saga material broadly correctly (at a popular level).
- Good practical advice on originality. The author advises composing your own runescript by intuition rather than copying someone else's template — a sensible idea that chimes with our own approach to building original spreads.
- A gentle entry for beginners in Spanish — low barrier, clear language, no overload.
Weaknesses and cautions
- Zero sources. Not a single reference or footnote in the whole book. The historical and the invented sit side by side undistinguished — a casual reader won't tell saga seiðr from Blum's blank rune.
- Revival passed off as antiquity. The blank Wyrd rune and the "Nine Noble Virtues" are presented as ancient heritage; in fact they are 20th-c. constructs (1982 and the 1970s). See the rune divination FAQ.
- A factual dating error. The futhark is assigned to "the 2nd c. BC" — an error of a whole epoch (it's actually 2nd c. AD), a marker of low academic care.
- Import without attribution. The book inherits from Blum, Thorsson and Aswynn but names none of them — the Spanish-language scene retells Anglophone esoterica without acknowledging its lineage.
- Efficacy = anecdote. There's no controlled data on runes; "it works" rests on confirmation bias. Where the effect is real, it's explainable through attention and state — cross-check meanings against philology in the reconstructed rune names.
Should you read Runas y Magia Nórdica — and who it's for
Yes — if you're an outright beginner, you read Spanish, and you want a gentle, accessible entry into modern rune practice while holding the frame "this is a 20th-century system, not antiquity." As a first practice read, the book does its job.
No — if you want history: what the Norse actually did with runes, how inscriptions are dated, what the rune names mean philologically. There are no sources here, no separation of layers, and no correct dating — for that, read the academics and cross-check with the reconstructed rune names.
A practical tip: take the practice and the general mythology from the book, but verify everything "historical" separately, and flag the blank Wyrd rune and the "Nine Noble Virtues" to yourself straight away as 20th-century constructs.
Conclusion
Runas y Magia Nórdica is a passable gentle entry into practice for a Spanish-speaking beginner, but a weak source on ancient runes. Its plus is the honest psychological framing and the accurate saga retelling; its trap is the absence of sources, passing Blum's modern invention off as antiquity, and the dating error. The book also has value as a document of how mainstream Anglophone esoteric runework sounds in the Spanish-language niche: it's an import, not a local tradition.
Our editorial rating: 2.5 / 5 — acceptable as a first practice read for beginners; weak as a source on ancient runes and on the tradition (no attributions, no sources, a dating error). (The rating is editorial and honest; we assign it as the reviewer, without inflation.)
FAQ
Is Vera's book about ancient runes or a modern system?
About a modern system. The historical chapters ("Las Principales Prácticas") retell the saga material — seiðr, spá, galdr — broadly correctly, but without a single reference. And the entire practical part (talismans, runescripts, bindrunes, spreads, rune meanings) is 20th–21st-century Anglophone esoterica, and its two most visible elements — the blank Wyrd rune and the "Nine Noble Virtues" — are wrongly presented as ancient heritage.
What is the "blank Wyrd rune," and how ancient is it?
It's a 25th, blank rune that the book calls "a modern addition to the Futhark system," but then softens: "the concept was probably known to the ancients too." In fact the blank rune was introduced by Ralph Blum in The Book of Runes (1982) — it does not exist in historical futharks at all. A 25-rune system with a blank Wyrd is a direct marker of the Blum lineage, not of Old Norse tradition.
Are the "Nine Noble Virtues" an ancient Norse code?
No. The "Nine Noble Virtues" (Courage, Truth, Honor, Fidelity, Discipline, Hospitality, Industry, Self-Reliance, Perseverance) are a 1970s construct (the Odinic Rite / Asatru Free Assembly milieu), not a saga code. The book attributes them to "historical sources" incorrectly: they are part of modern Ásatrú, not ancient heritage.
Can you learn real rune history from this book?
You shouldn't rely on it for that. The book has not one bibliographic reference, the historical and the invented aren't separated, and the futhark is misdated — "around the 2nd c. BC" instead of 2nd c. AD (off by an epoch). For history, read academic works and cross-check with our references on the names and reconstruction of the runes.
Does the rune magic in this book work?
There are no controlled studies of rune magic, so one can't claim it "works" in the sense of external magical causation. To the author's credit, she explains the effect psychologically: magic is "a self-determined exercise in which the results are known even before they happen," and a talisman's force "is generated by the mage's mind." That's a model of intention and expectation, and some of the techniques have an explainable effect — through attention and state, with no supernatural cause required.
Further
- Our internal book summary: Alyssa Vera — Runas y Magia Nórdica (Norse Magic for Beginners, 2022)
- Revival context: the rune-revival timeline · the Uthark
- Divination and meanings: the rune divination FAQ · the reconstructed rune names
Bibliographic data
Alyssa Vera. Runas y Magia Nórdica: La Guía para Principiantes sobre Rituales y Talismanes Paganos. — Self-published (Amazon KDP), 2022. ASIN B09QH14KS7 (published 13 January 2022). Original language: Spanish. Tier T2 (popular esoteric revival). The source for our analysis is our internal book summary (from a user-provided copy).