Runoscript DEESRU
Runoscript · Intention & flow

Intention, importance, flow — part 1: the doctrine of choosing reality, and the psychology that may actually be at work

⚠️ MARKUP AND HONESTY. This is a summary of the claims of a practice. Everything below is an exposition of the doctrine (practice-instruction / revival-claim), not confirmation that the entities described exist. This is late-20th / early-21st-c. eclecticism (pop-esoterica + pop-psychology + quantum-sounding metaphor), revival-claim; not an ancient tradition and not proven science.

Literal “external causality / steering reality / energy” (the space of variations, pendulums, balancing forces, thought radiation, outer intention as a force, “a transfer onto the lines of life,” the free energy of the Cosmos, the transaction, synchronicity) = [unverified] EVERYWHERE.

Summary

Part 1 lays out the [revival-claim] model of the modern practice of intention, in which reality is a space of variations: an infinite static field of already-existing “sectors” (a script + scenery), organized into “lines of life.” By the doctrine, a person does not reach a goal by effort but chooses a sector, tuning the “parameters of mental radiation” to it; the key tool is outer intention (“the resolve to have”), opposed to ordinary inner intention (“the resolve to act”). The chief obstacles, by the doctrine, are pendulums (energy-informational parasites that feed on the energy of people) and excess potentials, generated by importance (excessive significance). And so almost all the techniques come down to lowering importance, releasing one's grip, moving “with the current of variations,” and holding the ”target slide” (an inner picture of the achieved goal). All of this is [unverified] as a cosmology; it is documented as a set of practical instructions and psychological devices.

Key concepts

Tag on each: revival-claim (a postulate of the worldview) and/or practice-instruction (an operational instruction). Literal causality — [unverified].

Techniques

Format: Name — what to do (steps) / the claimed effect / the presumed mechanism (if the author names one). All the “claimed effects” about external reality are [unverified].

Connection with the mechanisms and the practice of the course

⚠️ A HYPOTHESIS, flagged as such. The thesis: some instructions of this practice may “work” not through the claimed external causality, but through inner psychological mechanisms. Any claim that a practice device causes “a change in external physical reality apart from changed behavior” = [unverified].

Net. The connection is structural and hypothetical, not a proof. In this practice (as in the practical track) the action is preserved: “intention in action,” “moving your feet,” “don't desire — take.” This accords with the requirement of the neighboring notes to keep a step of action and not to substitute an expectation for it.